Search Results for

Summer school trips were one of the high points of the year when I was a child. I don’t think anyone wholly forgets the bubbling anticipation that comes with the prospect of a totally brilliant trip.  Some were better than others.  An adventure weekend to Windermere where we jumped out of canoes and walked rope bridges was


News reaches us that Mr Scullion abandoned his appeal to the Supreme Court the day it was due to be heard.  This means that the law remains as set out by the Court of Appeal [2011] EWCA Civ 693 – that is to say, that the principle in Smith v Bush  [1990] 1 A.C. 831 only applies


It has been two weeks since the legal aid provisions of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) came into force on 1 April 2013. More of a whimper than a bang on an inauspicious day.   Will LASPO achieve its objectives: to reduce the legal aid bill and reduce the number


It is still far too early to know precisely what effect the Jackson reforms relating to costs in personal injury cases will have on professional negligence claims. Given the extent of the changes they are undoubtedly going to spawn a number of claims against solicitors for not using the rules to best advantage. But I


I turned 29 this week. As I reminisced about the days when hangovers were a mild inconvenience to be overcome within a matter of hours, my attention was drawn to a recent case arising out of an end-of-GCSE party, a paddling pool and an attempted bellyflop that went tragically wrong. On 20 July 2006, Ryan


Question: Which is the odd one out? Answer: The first one; all the others were used by peers to describe the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill at its Second Reading in the House of Lords. There is no doubting the Bill’s breadth. Everyone could agree on its heterogeneity: detractors called it a “hotchpotch”, a “patchwork”,


In Boyle v Thompsons Solicitors [2012] EWHC 36 (QB) Mr Justice Coulson considered the scope of a solicitor’s duty in resolving conflicts of expert medical evidence. The claimant (“Mrs B”) claimed damages from the defendant solicitors (“the Solicitors”) for their allegedly negligent conduct of her compensation claim to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (“CICA”).  


  A recent decision of Mr Justice Edwards-Stuart in the Technology And Construction Court (“TCC”) in Webb Resolutions Ltd v JV Ltd t/a Shepherd Chartered Surveyors [2013] EWHC 509 (TCC) considers lawyers’ obligations when drawing up court orders. The Claimants were assignees of a centralised mortgage lender suing the Defendant surveyors in respect of three


  The First of April might appear a foolish day to write about the Legal Ombudsman Scheme.  It is not new, but it is steadily gaining in popularity.  Since 2007, the scheme has been administered by the Office for Legal Complaints.  This free scheme is being expanded – up to £50,000 could now be awarded


    The claimant company (“JGPL”) in John Grimes Partnership Ltd v Gubbins [2013] EWCA Civ 37 provided consulting engineering services. It was engaged by Mr Gubbins, a farmer and property developer, to design a road and drainage scheme for his residential development and to obtain the necessary statutory approval by March 2007.  JGPL failed to


Subscribe for our newsletters, updates and seminars


Subscribe