Home > Chambers Resources > Cases > Wall v Mutuelle de Poitiers Assurances [2013] QB 53 (QB); [2014] EWCA Civ 138; LTL


Wall v Mutuelle de Poitiers Assurances [2013] QB 53 (QB); [2014] EWCA Civ 138; LTL




[2013] QB 53 (QB)

2013-02-12

This appeal arose out of a preliminary issue trial on the proper meaning of Articles 1.3 and 15 of the Rome II Regulation in the context of permission to rely on expert (medico-legal) evidence which was to be adduced on behalf of an Englishman who suffered spinal cord injury during the course of a holiday in France. Liability was conceded and it was common ground that the English Court had jurisdiction. However, the applicable law was that of France. The Defendant sought to restrict the Claimant's medico-legal expert evidence to the kind of French or "French-style" expert evidence that might be permitted by a French Court. The Defendant's arguments were rejected at first instance ([2013] EWHC 53 (QB)) and subsequently on appeal. The Court of Appeal gave important and timely guidance on the proper approach to expert evidence in claims of this kind (and on the meaning of Articles 1.3, 15 of and recital (33) to the Rome II Regulation). Matthew Chapman, led by Robert Weir QC, was instructed on behalf of the Claimant/Respondent.